Members are invited to contribute spiritual wisdom, teachings, channeled messages, uplifting content, healing sessions, and attunements to this network to bridge Heaven and Earth and unite Humanity as One.
Find your blog posts by visiting your profile page and clicking My Blog.
All Posts (5042)
Sort by
The 'unphysical', 'inexplicable', 'spirituality' that is nevertheless elicited by 'physical' substances and/or practices is contradictory. We must seek explanations like we do in science. In the case of the information we get via psychedelics, eg DMT, we must settle down the question as to whether they are comming from other worlds or the always exist hidden in the brain.
DMT is said to mimick serotonin. One of the functions of serotonin is to 'tell' the brain cells to 'sleep' (hence to dream). So when DMT bind to serotonin receptors of some cells, they begine to sleep. However, the brain still can detect less serotonin. Therefore the brain interprate the presence of DMT as a very different kind of sleep and hence a very different kind of dreams.
We relate sleep to unseen worlds the same way we relate night to stars. Though the 'unseen' is always there, the wake state eclipses the information.
The short answer is 'laziness'. People categorise things, ideas, people etc. We categorize ideas as 'scientific', 'religious', 'western', 'materialistic', 'christian', 'mental stuffs', 'pseudo-science', 'Arabs', 'Jews' etc. Analysing and judging individual people or ideas is far more difficult cause there are myriads of them. It is much easier to try to figure out what group they belong and then judge them according the stereotypes associated with that group.
In debates, this fallacy works wonders. When the devil's advocate want to 'show something wrong with the idea', he doesn't opt to lead the lazy crowd to think through the idea. He opt to convince them that 'this is metaphysical' or 'this is religion' , 'this is physicalism' etc. Then the attention shift from the idea they haven't thought through into what they 'know' about religion, metaphysics etc. The results of the red herring is a misjudgement of an idea that actualy doesn't completely fit the category!
When it comes to 'creator', the extreme ends of the pendulum are:
1.)creator is there and everything is possible including unstopable objects hitting imovable walls
2.)we live in an entirely mechanical world reducable to blind jiggling balls.
This too much assumptions about a being we know almost nothing about is the major problem. Fact is that the universe show some evidence of an intelligent creator. However, we see no evidence of an omnipotent, omniscient etc being. But since most people consider only the two options, they end up rejecting 'creator' all together because they find the idea of omnipotent being unteanable.
But is 'omnis' realy what drive us to desire God? Nope! All we need is a being with great potential. Not one that can 'do everything' cause we don't need most of those 'everythings'.
People swing into two extreme ends of the pendulum when it comes to prophesy.
1.)Knowing the future is possible and thus there must be a being behind prophesy, to whom the future is as clear as the past.
2.) Knowing anything about the future, at any time at any place is impossible.
Given these two 'religio-intellectual prisons', it is impossible to understand some messages, like some in the bible. Reading the bible, it is hard not conclude that sometimes people can foresee the future. At the same time, it is hard to argue that the bible never make incorrect predictions. Since people consider only the extremes, they hopelessly swing to the second end of the pendulum when they notice that the bible have even a slight error, or swing to the first end when they notice what appears like an accurate prediction.
Diabetes is a disease that involves the body's inability to take profit from the glucose (sugar) ingested, causing it to remain in the blood higher than normal amounts.
Eventually, blood that has a high level of glucose can lead to complications that damage different parts of our body, mainly the kidneys, eyes, nerves of the extremities, heart and blood vessels.
Diabetes is therefore in elevation of the amount of glucose in the blood and occurs because the body of the person decreases or does not have any secretion of insulin, a hormone produced by the pancreas, and is responsible to absorb glucose in the blood and put it in the cells; in turn they use it as an energy source.
With no insulin, glucose cannot enter cells and stay in the bloodstream, later it is eliminated in the urine. Excess of sugar in blood causes excess of sugar in the urine, leading to a sense of inner bitterness as sweetness that is eliminated.
Sugar symbolically represents the sweetness, gift, kindness, proof of love and recognition, has a maternal bond.
The presence of excessive sugar in blood indicates that we have difficulty in managing, to live or to obtain sweetness in our lives.
Diabetes expresses an emotional conflict of resistance (withstand or endure a situation or a person for a long time) and combat readiness. The person is often facing a danger and therefore must be ready for combat and for the flight, taking sugar in the blood ready to be used by the muscles when some of these options.
"I must resist because there is a danger" "I refuse to act" "I'm afraid to take action" "I think about it so much than, in the end, I do nothing".
The patient is ready for action, but fails to perform the act.
Conflict of fear more resistance to the look of someone or something that makes us feel fear, rejection, disappointment, injustice, etc.
Fear that something happens to us that we want to resist (a surgery, an abortion, to feel pushed to do something horrible to see ourselves forced to do something against our will, etc).
What does a diabetic resist to?
To permanent annoyance, to the disgusting, to injustice, rejection (as occurs migrants), unemployment, bankruptcy of a business, violence, unrequited love, etc.
The feeling of being watched and persecuted is commonly found in some diabetics, either because it is actually happening or because they imagine that happening.
There diabetics who are unconsciously obese, and they are made to create protection against attacks that are receiving or received, or to be free from desire, sexual abuse or suffered rape, "better get my body ugly so that others do not like me and do not violate me... I refuse. "
Moreover, the word diabetes comes from the Greek dia "through" and betes "run", "run through" referring to the abundant urine that occurs in diabetics, driven by the sugar.
But its other meaning is: day: "cut in two". Beth: "house", "the house is divided into two", there has been a separation conflict in the family:
"I resist separation and rejection, it is unfair”
"I feel excluded affectively, separated from the house (work, family, etc.)”
"It's unfair, I'm on the outside and the sweetness is inside".
"It's disgusting what they have done to me, the others stay at home”
"My body is my home. My country and my land is an extension of my body. When people come into my house, I do not tolerate them or they do not tolerate me, I isolate myself. Then: I RESIST ".
"My partner does not want me, but I refuse to leave”
"I am excluded from the inheritance”
Conflict of “The sweetness is over!”
Insulin represents authority. Conflict or active resistance to abusive authority making nasty things. There is some notion of muscular or psychological impotence because there is a confrontation with an authority (country, police, parent ...) that "I refuse”
"I want sweetness but I receive torture”
"I face authority, I cannot resist”
Sugar symbolizes sweetness, tenderness, love.
"Tenderness is dangerous for me”
"I do not want that love inside me".
"Love is toxic, dangerous (may have suffered sexual touching, or experiences with friends who love you, but mistreat you physically or psychologically, etc.)".
Insipidus diabetes (eliminating hazardous liquid): In a survival situation linked to the mother (or female part), you have to get rid of a real or symbolic "poison" inoculated in us (very harsh words that stain in a memory or conflict of clan).
The diabetic is a person who generally had a difficult childhood with parents or at least with some of them.
It may be a parent who showed with excessive authority (excessive rules and standards) and, consequently, devoid of sweetness. He/she rejected all ideas or desires and had to act according to what he/she ordered. These experiences have caused him/her enormous resentment and, above all, have hurt so much the fact of not being recognized.
Such lack experiences of love, tenderness, determined a sad and bitter behaviour that sometimes is hiding behind an exaggerated sense of humour.
People with diabetes have a loving realization of unrecognized desire.
Diabetic delivered a hard time, is unable to accept, to assimilate and open to pleasure and love, because they do not believe worthy.
You may think you do not want anyone, which could lead to anger and resentment.
He/she would you like to receive love, but he/she is not allowed to show his/her needs, he/she does not dare to actively seek:
"No, thanks, I should not take sugar”
Love and sweetness have a close relationship.
You may be drowning in a sea of sweetness, convinced that it is unable to take advantage of the lower part of the sugar it contains.
They do not feel valued or appreciated. They are very emotional people, hardworking and helpful, but with many expectations: they are always expecting something in return for what they do; waiting to receive.
They host many desires and not only for themselves but also for their loved ones. However, they can get very jealous when someone has more than them or feel guilty if what you want for others it does not manifest.
https://www.emotionsandbody.com/2016/12/diabetes-emotional-and-metaphysical.html
The question of 'miracles', or lack of them, are prone to unsubstanciated 'if-thens' that make people unable to explore rich middle grounds. The following are extreme ends of the pendulum.
1.)Miracles can happen. Thus we leave in a world where anything can happen at anywhere at any time. Furthermore there must be an omnipotent being behind them exactly like the one described by religions.
2.)Miracles cannot happen. Therefore we leave in an entirely mechanical world like the one described in mainstream science.
3.)If you can perform miracles then you are either an agent of the devil or an agent of God, as described in scriptures.
I use 'miracles' in quotes because even the very common definition as 'that which cannot be explained by scientific laws' is problematic if not downright silly. We don't know everything about 'laws of science'.
Itching is a feeling in the epidermis that involves scratching yourself. It is the sign of something that bites us. It indicates that there is something within us that excites us and that we have overlooked and wants to be discovered and liberated, like a burning passion, a desire.
When scratching relieves, it is indicative that the person has suffered a conflict of separation of pleasure.
"I'm frustrated, I need pleasure and when I scratch, I feel that sense of relief... it's so pleasant to receive what that person I want does not give me".
When scratching does not relieve, it talks about a general problem of breaking contact/separation.
"I feel dirty since hitting me”
What important thing happened in my life just before the appearance of the first symptoms of itching in a context of separation?
When itching appears after a problem of bilirubin in the blood: separation conflict with rancour, injustice. "I wish she had never come to me” "I'm so sorry to have met that wretch”
Itching may also appear after a change occurred in the life of a person who has made him/her break with the past (conflict of separation of pleasure) and forced him/her to seek new references, that is, to develop a new identity. What is my new site? How should I fill it?
Itching can also occur when a person is envious of something, but does not express it for fear of hurting someone or what they might think.
It is undeniable that some of what religions, spirituality etc termed it as 'miraculous healing' do infact happen. Faced with this fact, the so called scientists created a knwoledge like envelope to package ignorance and then termed it 'placebo effect'. The beleifs, knowledge etc, or in short, mind, is temporarily acknowledged that it can affect matter. However, what is under the bed is the fact that we don't yet understand the mind-matter interaction. Furthermore, if you try to use the premise that mind affect matter to underpin psi, alas they now deny that mind can affect matter!
But the 'placebo' dismisal is pointless because if beleifs etc can affect chemical/physical processes, then what is, for all relevant purposes, 'mirracels' can happen. This is for the simple fact that matter, together with forces of nature are spatialy extended. The mind can't affect matter without affecting EM forces. The forces in turn extend out of the body, even to the other person you are in contact with.
Life is eternal, enjoy life for all eternity! Alleluia! Amen! <3 O:) * (Y)
Like I have said, many say that we leave in a 'multidimensional reality' but we only experience a 'dimension' that we are in tunned with. This is akin to tunning to specific radio station. However this still leave a lot of questions unanswered. The radio or TV happens to amplify a specific frequency by (some its components) vibrating 'sympatheticaly' with the external signal. So do the observer in a multidimensional reality have neurons etc that vibrate coherently with a signal from a specific 'dimension'? I don't think so!
The deBroglie waves are different from the radio waves in that in the latter the waves themselves enter the radio receiver and drive the components. In the former, the wavicles of say electrons must interact with photons. The photons then bounce to the observer. It is this interaction that the simplistic radio analogy fail to explain. Waves tend to penetrate each other, rather than interacting.
To explain interactions, we must use the frequency idea to explain the non contact forces.
As has been said by many, frequencies can model unseen realities that inhabit the same space just like the radio waves from all the stations can (invisibly) coexist in the same space. This is due to the wavelike nature of matter termed deBroglie waves. But as normally presented it is too hand-waving and it leave several questions unanswered. For instance, why doesn't things easily pop into/ visibility if all it take is to tune in/out of specific bandwidth?
Remember that I had attempted to answer this by invorking some 'law' that demands that equal amount of the seen must go to the unseen as the amount of the useen comming to the seen. Combining this to the frequency idea, it states that for frequency of anything to step up from a lower frequency, another thing must step down from an higher frequency. We will then see that this is due to a very natural conservative law.
Remember I said that a scientist should re-state the conservative laws as 'the unseen donnot turn to the seen at least not without an equal amount of the seen turning to the unseen'. This is because our senses can't discern the difference between creation and manifestation of the unmanifest, should we try to falsify such claims as 'matter cannot be created or destroyed'. This then is essencialy what happen when a thing 'goes' to the unseen. The conservative 'law' demands a way of making an unseen to be seen. Compare this with the momentum conservative law stated that 'for a billiard ball to begine moving (go to the moving), another billiard ball must stop moving (go to the un-moving).
It is now explicable how it is difficult to discern a possible 'flux from the unseen' which might even be happening at every moment! It is similar to TV case. When we see an image in TV screen we are oblivious of the fact we are infact seeing miriads of closely identical images that are each 'comming and going'.
We intuit ex nihilo nihil. Yet if things surreptitiously appeared out of 'thin air', it would be impossible to acertain the so called conservative laws scientifically. This is because both the scenario of creation and manifestation, i.e two totaly different events, would appear as though exactly the same phenomenon to our senses. This also highlight limitation in science (i.e a posteriori knowledge).
This mean we must actualy change how we state the conservative laws of nature. This is to make the scientific statements falsifiable in principle as the 'ex nihilo nihil' isn't discernible from a 'law' that simply forbid manifestations out from the unseen.
Example way of correctly stating a conservative law is to say that the unseen thing cannot turn into the seen at least not without a similar amount of the seen turning into the unseen. As in all cases then, the so called 'laws of nature' look more like 'rules' when close exermined.
I have written a blog and have injected some of my opinions with the writings of “Rigden Djappo”. “Rigden” means King or Lord of Shambala, who has incarnated and is presently on planet Earth.
(Jeff) I know global warming is quite concerning and the outlook is not so positive. I believe that God, Source, the Universe, Great Mystery whatever you choose to reference that complete expression of love is, left us back-up solution to solve this challenge.
(Rigden) There is a very sacred place in Tibet called Mount Kailash. There are many pyramids known and yet to be discovered on planet Earth. All pyramids are aligned to Mount Kailash that is located in a remote area of Tibet. Imhotep the great priest who built the great pyramids, I believe did not do it to be used as a tourist attraction in the future ;-)
(Jeff) For lack of a better word all the pyramids and Mount Kailash are a machine. I believe that to activate this mechanism required a pure human heart, or a group of pure human hearts.
(Rigden) Once started there will be two main pyramids that are supported by all the other pyramids.
(Jeff) I believe these two pyramids will emanate a wave or frequency, that can shift or reverse the effects of global warming. This is just a feeling, I do not know this to be true...
Today I will explain to you how to recognize the syndrome of a ghost in the family tree.
Ghost or Spirit
It could also be called “replacement child”. For example, a child is born, his name is Antonio and he dies. After his passing, another child is born and the parents also call him Antonio. Antonio lives on Antonio’s mind. Furthermore, is very probably that the second child will never feel loved and recognized by his family and, even though he could receive tons of attention, he will still feel a lack of it. The reason for this is very clear: all what the parents are giving to the second child, unconsciously, they are giving to the first. The second child has no identity, not even he has his own name, but inherits the name of his deceased brother.
Abortions are another form of ghosts or spirits.
I will use a metaphor to explain this: Imagine that conception is equal to buy a plane ticket. We all mostly know that, once we are ready to board the plane, we show our tickets and go through a sort of tube that leads to the aircraft (if you are lucky and don’t have to take a bus). In this case, the plane would be the birth, to show the ticket would be the conception and passing through the tube would be the pregnancy. When there is an abortion, the baby buys the ticket, shows it and goes through the tube… but when he gets to the end…. Surprise!… there’s no aircraft… And now what?… well, I will wait here. So, when another baby comes after an abortion, the baby buys again a ticket, he shows it up and while going through the tube, he finds his brother or sister waiting and, of course, he invites such brother or sister to board the plane with him. In other words, when there’s an abortion, the unconscious part of the unborn baby doesn’t gets lost and when his brother or sister are born, this one inherits the unconscious of the unborn baby. Again, a body and two minds.
Vertical ghost or spirit
It is called in this way because it comes from the top, down. For example: your grandparents had a daughter that they named Maria and she died as a child. Your father, who’s Maria’s brother, calls you Maria when you are born.
Another example: Your grandmother (mother of your mother) had an abortion and after that she didn’t have any more children. You are her first born grandchild.
We find this kind of ghost or spirit syndromes through the death dates. When you are someone’s double because of their death date, and this person died before you were born, his/her unconscious lives in you. In other words you carry with the ghost or spirit of this ancestor. For example: your grandparents on your mother’s side had a child that died young, His name was Pedro and he was born on November 3rd 1984 at 5 months old. Your name is Juan, but you were born on November 6 2012.
The last sample: Your great grandmother died on September 3rd 1975 and you are born on June 3rd 1980
To conclude, I’d like to tell you that sometimes a person can show the symptoms of the syndrome his/her ghost or spirit even though, this one doesn’t belong in his/her family tree. It could be the sample of a family member that dies in our arms. And sometimes this person doesn’t even belong to the family. This fact is not very common, but it could happen. This would be the case of a death that you experienced closed to you and impacted you. Sometimes an accident in which you were involved or a friend that died while in your presence, etc. But , as I said, this cases are the less common.
Again I thank you for sharing this information. I sincerely hope you find it useful . Thank you.
This article was originally written in spanish by Saul Perez Sanchez who reserves author’s rights. For the original article please visit. http://www.saulperez.co/sindromedelyacente-2/
Knowing ourselves: What does the body want to tell us with diseases?
Based on GNM's “Ontogenetic System of Tumors”, the widely propagated theory of metastasis that suggests that cancer cells travel through the blood or lymph vessels and cause cancers at new sites is, in Dr. Hamer's words, “pure academic fiction”. Cells in general and cancer cells in particular can under no circumstances change their histological structure or cross the germ layer threshold. For example, a lung tumor cell, which is of endodermal origin, controlled from the brain stem (“old brain”), and which proliferates during the conflict-active phase cannot transform itself into a bone cell, which is of mesodermal origin, controlled from the cerebrum (“new brain”), and which deteriorates during a conflict-active decalcification process. In the scenario “lung cancer metastasizes into the bones”, the lung cancer cells would actually be creating a hole (i.e., cell meltdown!—the reverse of a cancer) in some bone in the body. We also have to ask ourselves why cancer cells rarely “spread” to the closest neighboring tissue, e.g., from the uterus to the cervix. If cancer cells travel via the bloodstream, why is donated blood not screened for cancer cells? Why are there not multitudinous tumors found in the walls of the blood vessels of cancer patients?
On August 19, 2004, the Canadian newspaper Globe and Mail published an article entitled, “Researchers Chase Breast-Cancer Blood Test”, containing the revealing statements, “The hunt for tumor cells in the bloodstream has taken 10 years… ”, and, “until recently no technology existed to reliably pluck out the odd tumor cell from the millions of red and white blood cells contained in a single vial of human blood.” Besides the fact that the “chase” is far from over (as the article indicates), doesn't this imply that the “metastasis” hypothesis was misinforming the public and was scaring millions of cancer patients to death for over four decades?
Dr. Hamer does not, of course, dispute the fact of second cancers, but these subsequent tumors are not caused by migrating cancer cells that miraculously transform into a different cell type, but rather by new conflict shocks. New conflicts can be initiated by additional traumatic life experiences or through diagnosis shocks. As already mentioned, an unexpected diagnosis of cancer, or being told that it is “metastasizing” can trigger a death-fright (causing lung cancer) or any other type of diagnosis-related shock, causing new cancers in other parts of the body. In many cases, these patients don't make it into the healing phase because the severe state of stress weakens them to a point where they have very little chance of surviving the highly toxic chemotherapy treatment.
The second most frequent cancer after lung cancer is bone cancer. Dr. Hamer found that our bones are biologically linked to our self-esteem and our self-worth. Thus, being told one has a “life-threatening illness”, especially one that allegedly “spreads like wildfire” through the body, is equated with: “now I am useless”, and the bone(s), next to where we feel “useless” start to decalcify (in the case of breast cancer often in the area of the sternum or the ribs). Just as with a fractured bone, the purpose of the biological program (of the “disease”) appears at the end of the healing phase. When the repair phase is completed, the bone will be much stronger at that site, thus assuring that we are better equipped for the eventuality of a new “self-devaluation conflict”.
GERMAN NEW MEDICINE® (GNM)
The New Medical Paradigm
Caroline Markolin, Ph.D.
Knowing ourselves: What does the body want to tell us with diseases?
Blood (family, clan) passes through the veins on its way back; once shared our love, it returns to the heart (house) with the love it has received from our environment.
Venous problems indicate that we find it difficult to accept or receive life, love and joy and allow a space within.
It can also mean that we are experiencing a devaluation conflict related to not being able to accept, manage, face, any family situation. "I am not able to carry this cross" "I have to clean the dirty blood of the family"
Necrosis in the veins: It mainly affects the legs and speaks of a devaluation itself, a devaluation that we perceive in ourselves.
Conflict of having "tied legs", "eggshells".
We have the feeling that "something" or "someone" binds us, we do not want or wouldn’t like to do; it is treated as an impediment to do something or we stop. We are as "trapped in a situation"
Examples:
- Women who want a fulfilling professional life and an unexpected pregnancy prevents it.
- Women who want to work, but when she married, her husband opposes her.
- Men who want to travel to study, but his family is not allowed.
Conflict of not being able to go home for something ugly to expect. "I cannot go home, the center of familiar territory"
In the peripheral veins, we must add a conflict of abandonment.
The legs are a reflection of our mobility in life, in our relationships. We express that we are disappointed because we have involved a lot in life, in the family and we feel dissatisfied because we have received very little in proportion to what we have given. There is a lack of return of life, family, etc.
We are upset and tired, because what we have lived seems bleak, without passion or joy.
We have a feeling of helplessness and a feeling of not knowing how to live our desires and our desire for happiness.
Varicose veins:
Veins that dilate and become tortuous. They are commonly found on the back of the calves or on the inner side of the leg. They develop when venous valves that allow blood to flow to the heart stop working properly. As a result, blood collects in the veins and causes dilatations. They are more common among women.
The biological meaning of varicose veins is to try to keep "dirty" blood from returning to the heart (home) and to the lungs, to be cleaned. Respond to dirt that we want to hide.
Conflict of devaluation, separation and stain.
Conflict of separation from home, repentance for having left home or separated from family: "I am away from home". "I'm trapped in a situation". "I want to go home, even though it's too late". "I have been a fool, I should not have left my house or my family for that man (that woman)". "I cannot go home". "I would like to have contact with my family again".
Conflict of the stain, to drag a sentence (personal or familiar): "There are too many things to clean in this family".
Sexual conflict added to a conflict of not wanting or not being able to return to the nest (to the home). We are experiencing a sexual conflict with our partner that is not pleasing to us, but we do not have the courage to abandon this dynamic and return home.
Varicose veins can also manifest in people who, accustomed to living a good life, suddenly lose that level, either because they have gone to live with a humble partner, because they have been disinherited or repudiated by the family.
Similarly, varicose veins can express that we feel overworked and overworked. It is possible that we have the tendency to take charge of everything, that we have many tasks to do (washing, ironing, cooking, cleaning the house, taking care of the grandchildren, etc.) that we find tedious and tedious. worry if we do not. To make matters worse, our husband does not help us, he treats us badly and we are the ones who must attend him, lest he be angry. We would love to run away from here, but we do not!
Added to this is the fact that everything we do, we do for duty, without joy.
"I feel drowned in this family". "I never feel at peace, at home". "I'm trapped in a situation". "I am the servant of the house". "I got tired of looking after my grandchildren". "I've had enough of living with my husband".
With varicose veins we want to express that we need more time for ourselves, that we want more free time, that we want more freedom in our life, because we lack it.
In the same way, it can indicate that our work does not like us or even, it annoys us; but we continue to do so because we are those people who are forced to stay in a situation even if they hate.
Recommendations for restoring physical, emotional and spiritual health:
For the circulation to be restored we need to change our attitude, our thoughts and try to resolve this loss of contact with the family, assuming and accepting that if we have moved away from our home and our family, it has been to live other experiences that have made them learn and grow, even though they were not as we would have liked them to be.
The man must be like water: first, you must learn to adapt to everything that is presented; and secondly, you need to always be moving to be kept clean and pure.
We must commit ourselves to the stream of life, without expecting anything in return, free of expectations.
We must do things with absolute responsibility, not out of obligation or to give us thanks.
It is better guided by the voice of the heart, always knows our true needs.
The right way is the return on oneself to rediscover the spiritual realm: "I am the truth and live and act with joy" "I love you so much I give my place" "Now I know that I must delegate responsibilities"
A good definition of 'science' is simply knowledge obtained via observation. Then 'pseudoscience' is the 'knowledge' that is claimed to be science but which actualy is not. The problem is that what constitute 'enough evidence' is actually subjective. To some pple, the school teaching and the satelite photograph of earth is not enough evidence that the earth is round. So to them, 'round earth theory' is pseudoscience!
A good attitude of a scientist or any other 'truth seeker' should not lead him to ridicul an idea that might be true after all. Yet 'pseudoscience' label is just that by nature! In the bible, it was stated that 'the earth is hanged upon nothing' during a time when no one could prove it! But if we booted the 'round earth hypothesis' in the 'pseudoscience' folder just because someone claimed it as fact but he could not prove it, then any attempt to verify it would not be respectable and this would retard knowledge.
Pancreatic enzymes are the most powerful of all. If enzymes are missing, food sits in the stomach or intestine and is expelled again undigested, so the body does not get the necessary energy from food.
When you have any symptoms related to the pancreas, you have lived or are living a situation where someone has dishonored you.
We can find two conflicts: ignominy + resistance.
"I have made (or have) a disgrace, something detestable".
"I have lived something unacceptable by someone from my family, my work and my social life"
Conflict of lacking and ignominy.
Conflict of fear and disgruntled members of the family when "big crap" have happened to them, related to an inheritance (real or symbolic). Be fooled within your own family.
"I fight for my bite” "My brother stole my share of the inheritance” "They made me sign a paper where I renounced my inheritance, etc". "I have done something detestable”
Fear of not having. "I have to store energy for later” "We criticize the morsel eaten".
Pancreatitis: If someone has an inflammation on his/her pancreas is because he/she is denied or is objecting to a situation or a person in particular. A situation that makes you feel bitterness or discouragement.
"I see every day how my husband offends me and mocks my humble origin”
What offends me so much to be a total lack of respect that steals my joy and sweetness that I expected of him/her.
Pancreatic calculation: "I do not want the other think I'm not noble”
"I take away money disown me and I want to get something for me”
Pancreatic cancer: the most common cancer in this organ is adenocarcinoma and is due to a setback occurred, most of the time, in the family that cannot be digested (indigestible) and, almost always, is related to any economic matter (real or symbolic dispute over inheritance, distribution of money or property, etc). It can also be caused by a feeling of revulsion, "This disgusts me”.
Recommendations to recover physical, emotional and spiritual health:
"I think the sweetness and joy in my life" "I love and approve of myself".
