Blogs

As has been said by many, frequencies can model unseen realities that inhabit the same space just like the radio waves from all the stations can (invisibly) coexist in the same space. This is due to the wavelike nature of matter termed deBroglie waves. But as normally presented it is too hand-waving and it leave several questions unanswered. For instance, why doesn't things easily pop into/ visibility if all it take is to tune in/out of specific bandwidth?

Remember that I had attempted to answer this by invorking some 'law' that demands that equal amount of the seen must go to the unseen as the amount of the useen comming to the seen. Combining this to the frequency idea, it states that for frequency of anything to step up from a lower frequency, another thing must step down from an higher frequency. We will then see that this is due to a very natural conservative law.

Remember I said that a scientist should re-state the conservative laws as 'the unseen donnot turn to the seen at least not without an equal amount of the seen turning to the unseen'. This is because our senses can't discern the difference between creation and manifestation of the unmanifest, should we try to falsify such claims as 'matter cannot be created or destroyed'. This then is essencialy what happen when a thing 'goes' to the unseen. The conservative 'law' demands a way of making an unseen to be seen. Compare this with the momentum conservative law stated that 'for a billiard ball to begine moving (go to the moving), another billiard ball must stop moving (go to the un-moving).

It is now explicable how it is difficult to discern a possible 'flux from the unseen' which might even be happening at every moment! It is similar to TV case. When we see an image in TV screen we are oblivious of the fact we are infact seeing miriads of closely identical images that are each 'comming and going'.

We intuit ex nihilo nihil. Yet if things surreptitiously appeared out of 'thin air', it would be impossible to acertain the so called conservative laws scientifically. This is because both the scenario of creation and manifestation, i.e two totaly different events, would appear as though exactly the same phenomenon to our senses. This also highlight limitation in science (i.e a posteriori knowledge).

This mean we must actualy change how we state the conservative laws of nature. This is to make the scientific statements falsifiable in principle as the 'ex nihilo nihil' isn't discernible from a 'law' that simply forbid manifestations out from the unseen.

Example way of correctly stating a conservative law is to say that the unseen thing cannot turn into the seen at least not without a similar amount of the seen turning into the unseen. As in all cases then, the so called 'laws of nature' look more like 'rules' when close exermined.

I have written a blog and have injected some of my opinions with the writings of “Rigden Djappo”. “Rigden” means King or Lord of Shambala, who has incarnated and is presently on planet Earth.

(Jeff) I know global warming is quite concerning and the outlook is not so positive. I believe that God, Source, the Universe, Great Mystery whatever you choose to reference that complete expression of love is, left us back-up solution to solve this challenge.

(Rigden) There is a very sacred place in Tibet called Mount Kailash. There are many pyramids known and yet to be discovered on planet Earth. All pyramids are aligned to Mount Kailash that is located in a remote area of Tibet. Imhotep the great priest who built the great pyramids, I believe did not do it to be used as a tourist attraction in the future ;-)

(Jeff) For lack of a better word all the pyramids and Mount Kailash are a machine. I believe that to activate this mechanism required a pure human heart, or a group of pure human hearts.

(Rigden) Once started there will be two main pyramids that are supported by all the other pyramids.

(Jeff) I believe these two pyramids will emanate a wave or frequency, that can shift or reverse the effects of global warming. This is just a feeling, I do not know this to be true...